Talk:Nimrod Long II: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: == II? == So I take it we have no idea why he was "II". Named after an uncle or grandfather maybe? --~~~~) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== II? == | == II? == | ||
So I take it we have no idea why he was "II". Named after an uncle or grandfather maybe? --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 08:47, 13 March 2014 (PDT) | So I take it we have no idea why he was "II". Named after an uncle or grandfather maybe? --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 08:47, 13 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
* I think that's likely. As I understand it, traditionally, Jrs are named for their fathers and IIs are named for some other relative, but IIIs can be either the sons of Jrs or IIs or just the IIIrd in their family to carry the name. Then there are the ones that go by the same names as their fathers, but have a different middle name, so they aren't a Jr or a II. I never knew I'd get so deep into this stuff when I started Bhamwiki. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 11:35, 13 March 2014 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:35, 13 March 2014
II?
So I take it we have no idea why he was "II". Named after an uncle or grandfather maybe? --Lkseitz 08:47, 13 March 2014 (PDT)
- I think that's likely. As I understand it, traditionally, Jrs are named for their fathers and IIs are named for some other relative, but IIIs can be either the sons of Jrs or IIs or just the IIIrd in their family to carry the name. Then there are the ones that go by the same names as their fathers, but have a different middle name, so they aren't a Jr or a II. I never knew I'd get so deep into this stuff when I started Bhamwiki. --Dystopos 11:35, 13 March 2014 (PDT)