Talk:Mayor of Hoover: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Hodnett) |
m (→article name: left out a word) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Hodnett == | == Hodnett == | ||
The indications are that Hodnett became Hoover's elected mayor in 1976 after finishing Braddock's term, but I'm not 100% certain of that. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 11:58, 6 February 2007 (PST) | The indications are that Hodnett became Hoover's elected mayor in 1976 after finishing Braddock's term, but I'm not 100% certain of that. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 11:58, 6 February 2007 (PST) | ||
==article name== | |||
* I like what you've done here. I think it's better than "List of Mayors of Such-and-such". Good thinking. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 13:10, 6 February 2007 (PST) | |||
:* I have to give [[User:Wheresdib|Darren]] credit for it. He put the link in [[Hoover]], which I clicked on to add the entry. Although it was a concious decision by me to deviate from the format used in [[List of mayors of Birmingham]] (until now) and see how it went over. I'm glad it went over well. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 15:41, 6 February 2007 (PST) | |||
::*Wow I actually did something good to the wiki! LOL... It made sense to me to have an article for "Mayor of suchandsuch" when it is really an article. A list should just be a list with links to the articles. While having articles for each mayor makes sense, talking about the mayoral history of the city sounded like a good article to me as well. [[User:Wheresdib|--Wheresdib]] 16:07, 6 February 2007 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 19:08, 6 February 2007
Hodnett
The indications are that Hodnett became Hoover's elected mayor in 1976 after finishing Braddock's term, but I'm not 100% certain of that. --Lkseitz 11:58, 6 February 2007 (PST)
article name
- I like what you've done here. I think it's better than "List of Mayors of Such-and-such". Good thinking. --Dystopos 13:10, 6 February 2007 (PST)
- I have to give Darren credit for it. He put the link in Hoover, which I clicked on to add the entry. Although it was a concious decision by me to deviate from the format used in List of mayors of Birmingham (until now) and see how it went over. I'm glad it went over well. --Lkseitz 15:41, 6 February 2007 (PST)
- Wow I actually did something good to the wiki! LOL... It made sense to me to have an article for "Mayor of suchandsuch" when it is really an article. A list should just be a list with links to the articles. While having articles for each mayor makes sense, talking about the mayoral history of the city sounded like a good article to me as well. --Wheresdib 16:07, 6 February 2007 (PST)