Talk:MAPS

Adding to the story

There was a lot missing from the initial article. The omission of the "domed stadium" controversy was serious. I hope my contribution preserves the neutral point of view while adding important details. I am still unhappy with the list of projects that is ranked by "popularity." The list of projects authorized in the enabling legislation was rather different. No "light rail," for instance. The Oklahoma City model also deserved a mention. -- Rob 18:20, 2 October 2006 (PDT)

• Thanks for your help. It would be good to have the list as it was authorized (and to de-emphasize the unofficial poll). I didn't have much in the way of tertiary sources to reference regarding the controversies. I agree with referencing the OKC precedent and with the general need to continue expanding and improving this article. --Dystopos 19:00, 2 October 2006 (PDT)