File talk:Its-nice-to-have-you-in-birmingham-rickwood-classic-2010.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Bhamwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
*** so the photographer agreed to relicense it and now I'm torn because the photo of it with Andre Natta is a solid option, perhaps the better option. Though I'd feel like a jackass to ask them to switch and then not use it so what do youthink about doing a small image on the side of one and then a gallery of all the murals in the middle of the page? --[[User:MichaelTunnell|MichaelTunnell]] ([[User talk:MichaelTunnell|talk]]) 08:31, 3 May 2016 (PDT)
*** so the photographer agreed to relicense it and now I'm torn because the photo of it with Andre Natta is a solid option, perhaps the better option. Though I'd feel like a jackass to ask them to switch and then not use it so what do youthink about doing a small image on the side of one and then a gallery of all the murals in the middle of the page? --[[User:MichaelTunnell|MichaelTunnell]] ([[User talk:MichaelTunnell|talk]]) 08:31, 3 May 2016 (PDT)
**** What if we ask her about using another photo, like [https://www.flickr.com/photos/johnnystiletto/4664230829/in/album-72157624191879084/ this one], on the Rickwood Field and/or Rickwood Classic pages? --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] ([[User talk:Dystopos|talk]]) 08:36, 3 May 2016 (PDT)
**** What if we ask her about using another photo, like [https://www.flickr.com/photos/johnnystiletto/4664230829/in/album-72157624191879084/ this one], on the Rickwood Field and/or Rickwood Classic pages? --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] ([[User talk:Dystopos|talk]]) 08:36, 3 May 2016 (PDT)
***** That sounds good to me. :) I'll ask on that photo.
----
Do have a photo of any of the other murals? Also should we discuss this on this thread or on the main article page discussion section? --[[User:MichaelTunnell|MichaelTunnell]] ([[User talk:MichaelTunnell|talk]]) 08:46, 3 May 2016 (PDT)

Revision as of 10:46, 3 May 2016

I messed up on this one. I didn't think CC BY-NC would be an issue since BW doesn't use photos commercially but I just saw the notice that says not to upload stuff with CC BY-NC so feel free to delete this. I couldn't find a way to delete it myself. --MichaelTunnell (talk) 22:46, 2 May 2016 (PDT)

  • I just asked the photographer if they would relicense it for BY-SA, I'll update here once I get a response. --MichaelTunnell (talk) 22:57, 2 May 2016 (PDT)
    • Several options: (1) We can go ahead with the photographer's permission to use the BY-SA license. (2) We can follow and clearly reference the terms of the photographer's existing BY-NC licensing (We are non-commercial, but our typical license allows commercial uses that preserve the BY-SA licensing). (3) With permission, we can publish it with a normal copyright notice and the Template:Permission, or (4) We can use a photo I took the same day that also happens to have Andre Natta in it wearing his version of the t-shirt. --Dystopos (talk) 06:30, 3 May 2016 (PDT)
      • so the photographer agreed to relicense it and now I'm torn because the photo of it with Andre Natta is a solid option, perhaps the better option. Though I'd feel like a jackass to ask them to switch and then not use it so what do youthink about doing a small image on the side of one and then a gallery of all the murals in the middle of the page? --MichaelTunnell (talk) 08:31, 3 May 2016 (PDT)
        • What if we ask her about using another photo, like this one, on the Rickwood Field and/or Rickwood Classic pages? --Dystopos (talk) 08:36, 3 May 2016 (PDT)
          • That sounds good to me. :) I'll ask on that photo.

Do have a photo of any of the other murals? Also should we discuss this on this thread or on the main article page discussion section? --MichaelTunnell (talk) 08:46, 3 May 2016 (PDT)