Talk:COVID-19 pandemic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(In short, agreed.) |
(→Name) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* I had originally called this article the "2019 Coronavirus pandemic" because the virus itself is named for the year it was identified, but now that seems like it would cause confusion. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] ([[User talk:Dystopos|talk]]) 09:41, 19 March 2020 (PDT) | * I had originally called this article the "2019 Coronavirus pandemic" because the virus itself is named for the year it was identified, but now that seems like it would cause confusion. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] ([[User talk:Dystopos|talk]]) 09:41, 19 March 2020 (PDT) | ||
** I was up in the air over it. I understood why you'd done it (without you explaining it). If it makes you feel better, while the infection is named "COVID-19" and began in 2019, but it wasn't declared a pandemic until 2020. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] ([[User talk:Lkseitz|talk]]) 05:38, 20 March 2020 (PDT) | ** I was up in the air over it. I understood why you'd done it (without you explaining it). If it makes you feel better, while the infection is named "COVID-19" and began in 2019, but it wasn't declared a pandemic until 2020. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] ([[User talk:Lkseitz|talk]]) 05:38, 20 March 2020 (PDT) | ||
*** That's a good point. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] ([[User talk:Dystopos|talk]]) 10:06, 20 March 2020 (PDT) |
Revision as of 12:06, 20 March 2020
Name
- I had originally called this article the "2019 Coronavirus pandemic" because the virus itself is named for the year it was identified, but now that seems like it would cause confusion. --Dystopos (talk) 09:41, 19 March 2020 (PDT)