Talk:Highlands United Methodist Church: Difference between revisions

From Bhamwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
The [http://www.highlandsumc.net/about-us/history/ history page] at the church web site would seem to indicate they moved to Five Points Chapel in September 1903, not 1904.  Who was the Chapel built for?  They didn't organize as a congregation until December 1903, so I'd assume they didn't build it. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 12:32, 18 June 2014 (PDT)
The [http://www.highlandsumc.net/about-us/history/ history page] at the church web site would seem to indicate they moved to Five Points Chapel in September 1903, not 1904.  Who was the Chapel built for?  They didn't organize as a congregation until December 1903, so I'd assume they didn't build it. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 12:32, 18 June 2014 (PDT)
* Yeah, I got confused about the relationship of the chapel to the Christian Science church. Was it the same site or a neighboring site? One of those things were I just shove it to the back burner until a clear reference passes by. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 14:02, 18 June 2014 (PDT)
* Yeah, I got confused about the relationship of the chapel to the Christian Science church. Was it the same site or a neighboring site? One of those things were I just shove it to the back burner until a clear reference passes by. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 14:02, 18 June 2014 (PDT)
== Reference Link No longer valid ==
The 3-D model link is no longer active. Do we leave it for history's sake or delete it?

Latest revision as of 07:29, 25 November 2021

Five Points Chapel date

The history page at the church web site would seem to indicate they moved to Five Points Chapel in September 1903, not 1904. Who was the Chapel built for? They didn't organize as a congregation until December 1903, so I'd assume they didn't build it. --Lkseitz 12:32, 18 June 2014 (PDT)

  • Yeah, I got confused about the relationship of the chapel to the Christian Science church. Was it the same site or a neighboring site? One of those things were I just shove it to the back burner until a clear reference passes by. --Dystopos 14:02, 18 June 2014 (PDT)

Reference Link No longer valid

The 3-D model link is no longer active. Do we leave it for history's sake or delete it?