Talk:WTTO: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Oh. Oops.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* I'll massage it. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 12:18, 29 August 2006 (PDT) | * I'll massage it. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 12:18, 29 August 2006 (PDT) | ||
::Oh, I see now. I was reading "declined" in the wrong sense. ("Weakened" instead of "refused.") --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 14:06, 29 August 2006 (PDT) | ::Oh, I see now. I was reading "declined" in the wrong sense. ("Weakened" instead of "refused.") --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 14:06, 29 August 2006 (PDT) | ||
==CW21== | |||
How would you guys recommend we handle the image on this page? The WTTO website has the new CW21 logos but I don't want to not show the WB21 logo. Should WB21 have its own page, stating that it was the nickname of WTTO when the station was a WB affiliate? Or just add both images to the WTTO page? [[User:Wheresdib|--Wheresdib]] 13:53, 18 October 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:53, 18 October 2006
"The station was successful as an independent and declined to debut Fox network when it launched in 1986." I think there's a word or two missing here, but I can't quite figure out what it's supposed to mean. --Lkseitz 06:39, 29 August 2006 (PDT)
- I'll massage it. --Dystopos 12:18, 29 August 2006 (PDT)
- Oh, I see now. I was reading "declined" in the wrong sense. ("Weakened" instead of "refused.") --Lkseitz 14:06, 29 August 2006 (PDT)
CW21
How would you guys recommend we handle the image on this page? The WTTO website has the new CW21 logos but I don't want to not show the WB21 logo. Should WB21 have its own page, stating that it was the nickname of WTTO when the station was a WB affiliate? Or just add both images to the WTTO page? --Wheresdib 13:53, 18 October 2006 (PDT)