User talk:Patriarca12: Difference between revisions

From Bhamwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Welcome}} Feel free to e-mail me or leave a note on [[User Talk:Dystopos|my talk page]] if you have questions.  --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 09:10, 18 May 2006 (PDT)
{{Welcome}} Feel free to e-mail me or leave a note on [[User Talk:Dystopos|my talk page]] if you have questions.  --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 09:10, 18 May 2006 (PDT)
==photographs==
* Great new articles blossoming! With the addition of the [[Windham Building]] to the list, I believe BhamWiki now has the most comprehensive catalog of [[Wallace Rayfield]]'s works anywhere. Excellent!
:Just to make sure you are fully aware, any photographs uploaded to BhamWiki need to be released under the Creative Commons Atrribution ShareAlike 2.5 license (See [[Bhamwiki:Copyrights]]). I noticed that the Windham Building photo contains a copyright notice. It's fine to leave that there as a precaution as long as you understand that any user finding the image on BhamWiki ''will'' be able to re-use it under the terms of the Creative Commons license. If this is not your intent, the images should be removed to protect your rights.  --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 17:13, 11 July 2006 (PDT)

Revision as of 19:13, 11 July 2006

Hello and welcome to Bhamwiki. We're really excited to see your contributions. If you haven't already, please read our User agreement and then feel free to dive in. Feel free to e-mail me or leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Dystopos 09:10, 18 May 2006 (PDT)

photographs

  • Great new articles blossoming! With the addition of the Windham Building to the list, I believe BhamWiki now has the most comprehensive catalog of Wallace Rayfield's works anywhere. Excellent!
Just to make sure you are fully aware, any photographs uploaded to BhamWiki need to be released under the Creative Commons Atrribution ShareAlike 2.5 license (See Bhamwiki:Copyrights). I noticed that the Windham Building photo contains a copyright notice. It's fine to leave that there as a precaution as long as you understand that any user finding the image on BhamWiki will be able to re-use it under the terms of the Creative Commons license. If this is not your intent, the images should be removed to protect your rights. --Dystopos 17:13, 11 July 2006 (PDT)