User talk:Lkseitz/Archive 3
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Categories (Artintegrated)
In converting your articles from the Wikipedia format, you're now doing a better job of eliminating links that won't be found here at BhamWiki. However, please try to remember to update the categories at the bottom of the entry, too. Thanks. --Lkseitz 06:45, 11 January 2007 (PST)
- I dont claim or even want to put up a perfect article. Reformatting for another system can be somewhat daunting. I normally leave that to the experts and I have no claims on that. On the other hand, my strong point BHWP is to add information. I seem to have plenty of that and I feel that that is of assistance. I will try to give you the most updated information that I have and correct to the best of my ability. Other people have excellent editing and article-building skills. I will do what I do best and you guys do what you do best. We should get along just fine. Sweet! Artsojourner 08:30, 11 January 2007 (PST)
Category:Death of brain cancer
- I think "Category:Cancer deaths" is a better formulation than "Category:Deaths of cancer".. and I'm not sure that category will be so large that it needs to be subdivided. What's on your mind? --Dystopos 08:19, 16 January 2007 (PST)
- Yes, that's a better name. Thanks. I'm writing an entry for Harold Ruttenberg, who died of brain cancer. A previous entry I wrote, Jack Farr, also died of this. I was simply guessing "Cancer deaths" could get to be a really, really big category and perhaps it should be subdivided. It's easier to do that up front that go back and break it down after the fact. But I guess that category will do for now. --Lkseitz 08:36, 16 January 2007 (PST)
Bear Bryant
Thanks for the help with the cleanup on Bear Bryant. I had it almost perfect and clicked the wrong button and lost all my changes. So I went back and re-copied it all from Wikipedia but had to rush through it to make it to a meeting I had to go to. Anyway, thanks as always for all you do. --Wheresdib 14:37, 26 January 2007 (PST)
- You're welcome. I hate it when that happens. (You lose all your changes.) --Lkseitz 15:00, 26 January 2007 (PST)
Blizzard of 93
I think it must be some sort of milestone when we have articles I didn't even know we had. --Dystopos 14:05, 28 January 2007 (PST)
- Hee, hee. Snuck one by you, did I? :-) Actually, I geared up and did a bunch of web surfing to research it, but when I got down to writing it, I seemed to lose my motiviation, resulting in a stub I never went back to. --Lkseitz 14:15, 28 January 2007 (PST)
Nehemiah's Quest
- Thought you'd like to know that your article on Nehemiah's Quest is getting a lot of hits via Google. Thanks for giving us the scoop. --Dystopos 17:41, 26 March 2007 (PDT)
- Well no wonder; we're Google's number one result for that search term. While the group's own site is much further down. How odd. And I wonder what's spurring those searches? Thanks for the tip. --Lkseitz 07:29, 27 March 2007 (PDT)
Temple Emanu-El
Thanks Lee. I went back and saw that it was too much "personal" and was planning to revise today.
I have an article in the works about Charley Boswell. Next, I have a few more rabbis. --MacroAlan 06:50, 14 October 2007 (PDT)
- No problem, but I didn't do much. Dystopos did most of the work. And just because we touched it doesn't mean you can't come back and make more improvements. --Lkseitz 07:12, 14 October 2007 (PDT)