Talk:Tutwiler Hotel: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Copyright infringement?) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Tutwilers== | ==Tutwilers== | ||
We'll need to distinguish between the old Tutwiler Hotel and the present one with separate articles. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 14:04, 30 November 2006 (PST) | We'll need to distinguish between the old Tutwiler Hotel and the present one with separate articles. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 14:04, 30 November 2006 (PST) | ||
== Copyright? == | |||
Please pardon my suspicions, but as this entry was created by the self-confessed [[User:JFridley|director of sales for the Tutwiler]], it strikes me not as something that was written specifically for BhamWiki, but a press release or news story that was conveniently lying around. The last three paragraphs, in particular, sound like a press release about the hotel's remodeling. And after some searching I found the source for those. [http://thetutwilerhotel.com/renovations.html] | |||
So my question is, where do we go from here? I can rip out the last three paragraphs or so and rewrite those. (In fact, I was probably going to anyway.) But what do we do about the rest? Even if the first part is not infringing, a source for the quotes would be nice. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 14:13, 30 November 2006 (PST) |
Revision as of 17:13, 30 November 2006
Tutwilers
We'll need to distinguish between the old Tutwiler Hotel and the present one with separate articles. --Dystopos 14:04, 30 November 2006 (PST)
Copyright?
Please pardon my suspicions, but as this entry was created by the self-confessed director of sales for the Tutwiler, it strikes me not as something that was written specifically for BhamWiki, but a press release or news story that was conveniently lying around. The last three paragraphs, in particular, sound like a press release about the hotel's remodeling. And after some searching I found the source for those. [1]
So my question is, where do we go from here? I can rip out the last three paragraphs or so and rewrite those. (In fact, I was probably going to anyway.) But what do we do about the rest? Even if the first part is not infringing, a source for the quotes would be nice. --Lkseitz 14:13, 30 November 2006 (PST)