User talk:Lkseitz: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Templates: Oh.) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
**** Okay, [[Bhamwiki:Licensing templates]] is updated, [[Bhamwiki:Media templates]] has been written, and the media templates categorized into [[:Category:Media templates|their own category]]. It looks like [[Template:Fair use-ad|ads]], [[Template:Fair use-Logo|logos]], and [[Template:Fair use-Program|programs]] still need media templates, as those three types of things still have individual fair use templates. I suspect it was something you were going to do, took a break from, and then forgot about. I might work on it in the future, but not today. If you want to, I think the following templates can be deleted, but you might want to double-check that we're not using them: [[Template:Fair use-Book]],[[Template:Fair use-CD]], and [[Template:Fair use-Program]]. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 12:12, 5 May 2010 (PDT) | **** Okay, [[Bhamwiki:Licensing templates]] is updated, [[Bhamwiki:Media templates]] has been written, and the media templates categorized into [[:Category:Media templates|their own category]]. It looks like [[Template:Fair use-ad|ads]], [[Template:Fair use-Logo|logos]], and [[Template:Fair use-Program|programs]] still need media templates, as those three types of things still have individual fair use templates. I suspect it was something you were going to do, took a break from, and then forgot about. I might work on it in the future, but not today. If you want to, I think the following templates can be deleted, but you might want to double-check that we're not using them: [[Template:Fair use-Book]],[[Template:Fair use-CD]], and [[Template:Fair use-Program]]. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 12:12, 5 May 2010 (PDT) | ||
***** I'm intimidated by the number of edits needed to replace the logo template. Any ideas? --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 14:09, 5 May 2010 (PDT) | ***** I'm intimidated by the number of edits needed to replace the logo template. Any ideas? --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 14:09, 5 May 2010 (PDT) | ||
****** I hadn't looked at the numbers. Over 600, eh? Well, maybe logos can just continue to be a special case, then. And in case you were wondering why I said the program fair use template could be deleted, I meant to say [[Template:Fair use-Postcard]]. (And it's redirect, [[Template:Fair use-Post card]].) Sorry, I trimmed the wrong thing after I copied & pasted. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 07:32, 6 May 2010 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:32, 6 May 2010
Archives
Sterling Foster
- I meant to have taken the dates from the SHPC page. I must have used the wrong set. My bad. --Dystopos 15:33, 9 April 2010 (PDT)
Templates
- It might be a good idea to start a Bhamwiki:Templates page to document what's available. --Dystopos 09:52, 27 April 2010 (PDT)
- Agreed. I'll see if I can get to it soon. --Lkseitz 11:50, 27 April 2010 (PDT)
- Behold, Bhamwiki:Templates. Kinda lengthy, but there you go. BTW, Bhamwiki:Licensing templates needs to be updated and I don't have permissions to do it. --Lkseitz 15:19, 4 May 2010 (PDT)
- Awesome. I took the lazy way out and unprotected it. (I still have two years of homicide prosecutions to review, and then the Birmingham Americans...) --Dystopos 15:23, 4 May 2010 (PDT)
- Okay, Bhamwiki:Licensing templates is updated, Bhamwiki:Media templates has been written, and the media templates categorized into their own category. It looks like ads, logos, and programs still need media templates, as those three types of things still have individual fair use templates. I suspect it was something you were going to do, took a break from, and then forgot about. I might work on it in the future, but not today. If you want to, I think the following templates can be deleted, but you might want to double-check that we're not using them: Template:Fair use-Book,Template:Fair use-CD, and Template:Fair use-Program. --Lkseitz 12:12, 5 May 2010 (PDT)
- I'm intimidated by the number of edits needed to replace the logo template. Any ideas? --Dystopos 14:09, 5 May 2010 (PDT)
- I hadn't looked at the numbers. Over 600, eh? Well, maybe logos can just continue to be a special case, then. And in case you were wondering why I said the program fair use template could be deleted, I meant to say Template:Fair use-Postcard. (And it's redirect, Template:Fair use-Post card.) Sorry, I trimmed the wrong thing after I copied & pasted. --Lkseitz 07:32, 6 May 2010 (PDT)
- I'm intimidated by the number of edits needed to replace the logo template. Any ideas? --Dystopos 14:09, 5 May 2010 (PDT)
- Okay, Bhamwiki:Licensing templates is updated, Bhamwiki:Media templates has been written, and the media templates categorized into their own category. It looks like ads, logos, and programs still need media templates, as those three types of things still have individual fair use templates. I suspect it was something you were going to do, took a break from, and then forgot about. I might work on it in the future, but not today. If you want to, I think the following templates can be deleted, but you might want to double-check that we're not using them: Template:Fair use-Book,Template:Fair use-CD, and Template:Fair use-Program. --Lkseitz 12:12, 5 May 2010 (PDT)
- Awesome. I took the lazy way out and unprotected it. (I still have two years of homicide prosecutions to review, and then the Birmingham Americans...) --Dystopos 15:23, 4 May 2010 (PDT)