Talk:Birmingham Barracudas: Difference between revisions

From Bhamwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
[http://www.bhamnews.com/archives/ Birmingham News archives], 1995 editions, online search. Accessed October 30, 2006. --[[User:Patriarca12|Patriarca12]] 07:24, 31 October 2006 (PST)
[http://www.bhamnews.com/archives/ Birmingham News archives], 1995 editions, online search. Accessed October 30, 2006. --[[User:Patriarca12|Patriarca12]] 07:24, 31 October 2006 (PST)


:* I do love having BhamWiki be a definitive source. I'll leave the citation up to you. Your proposal is similar to what we have at [[List of interstate accidents involving dropped steel]]. At [[List of Birmingham homicides in 2006]] I put a little link after every listing. Both are adequate. Neither is perfect. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 07:52, 31 October 2006 (PST)
:* I do love having BhamWiki be a definitive source. I'll leave the citation up to you. Your proposal is similar to what we have at [[List of interstate accidents caused by dropped steel]]. At [[List of Birmingham homicides in 2006]] I put a little link after every listing. Both are adequate. Neither is perfect. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 07:52, 31 October 2006 (PST)

Revision as of 10:53, 31 October 2006

References

  • For sports articles like these where many different sources are utilized from the same medium, would it be acceptable to have a single citation like the one as follows as opposed to the multitude I will have listed when I complete this article? BTW, this will be the definitive source on-line for the short tenure of the Barracudas ;-)

Birmingham News archives, 1995 editions, online search. Accessed October 30, 2006. --Patriarca12 07:24, 31 October 2006 (PST)