Template talk:Decade box: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Whatcha think?: Done) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* This definitely fills a need. Ultimately the intention is to absorb the 'buildings" categories into the "works" categories, so we might incorporate that merger. I think the text could be smaller and not bolded, as well. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 21:29, 13 February 2007 (PST) | * This definitely fills a need. Ultimately the intention is to absorb the 'buildings" categories into the "works" categories, so we might incorporate that merger. I think the text could be smaller and not bolded, as well. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 21:29, 13 February 2007 (PST) | ||
** Now smaller and not bolded. I left the Buildings category link in for now. Once the categories get rearranged, we take that link out of the template and pow! -- all the pages that use it are updated. (Ah, the beauty of templates.) --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 21:40, 13 February 2007 (PST) | ** Now smaller and not bolded. I left the Buildings category link in for now. Once the categories get rearranged, we take that link out of the template and pow! -- all the pages that use it are updated. (Ah, the beauty of templates.) --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 21:40, 13 February 2007 (PST) | ||
*** Looking again, I wonder if, in the example, instead of linking to 1949 and 1960 we should link to the 1940s and 1960s, (maybe a page with just the corresponding template on it) -- and perhaps those links should be in the header bar (smaller than the title) rather than in the list of years. Whatcha think? --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 06:57, 14 February 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 09:57, 14 February 2007
Whatcha think?
Okay, what do y'all think of this template? I've implemented it on 2005, 2006, and 2007 so far. --Lkseitz 21:26, 13 February 2007 (PST)
- This definitely fills a need. Ultimately the intention is to absorb the 'buildings" categories into the "works" categories, so we might incorporate that merger. I think the text could be smaller and not bolded, as well. --Dystopos 21:29, 13 February 2007 (PST)
- Now smaller and not bolded. I left the Buildings category link in for now. Once the categories get rearranged, we take that link out of the template and pow! -- all the pages that use it are updated. (Ah, the beauty of templates.) --Lkseitz 21:40, 13 February 2007 (PST)
- Looking again, I wonder if, in the example, instead of linking to 1949 and 1960 we should link to the 1940s and 1960s, (maybe a page with just the corresponding template on it) -- and perhaps those links should be in the header bar (smaller than the title) rather than in the list of years. Whatcha think? --Dystopos 06:57, 14 February 2007 (PST)
- Now smaller and not bolded. I left the Buildings category link in for now. Once the categories get rearranged, we take that link out of the template and pow! -- all the pages that use it are updated. (Ah, the beauty of templates.) --Lkseitz 21:40, 13 February 2007 (PST)