Ecoplex: Difference between revisions

From Bhamwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Birmingham Ecoplex''' was a proposed 300-acre "world class" zoological park. The plans were developed by the '''Birmingham Ecological Association''' for a large tract of property owned by [[USX]] just southeast of [[Liberty Park]] near [[I-459]]. The $78.5 million project to replace the [[Birmingham Zoo]] never progressed beyond the master plan stage due to the inability of supporters to get funding commitments from [[Jefferson County]] and many of the region's separate municipalities.
[[Image:Ecoplex master plan.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Master plan for the Ecoplex]]
The '''Birmingham Ecoplex''' was a 300-acre "world class" zoological park proposed in the mid-1990s. The plans were developed by the '''Birmingham Ecological Association''' for a large tract of property owned by [[USX]] just southeast of [[Liberty Park]] near [[I-459]]. The $78.5 million project to replace the [[Birmingham Zoo]] never progressed beyond the master plan stage due to the inability of supporters to get funding commitments from [[Jefferson County]] and many of the region's separate municipalities.


==Origins==
==Origins==
The Ecoplex was proposed as a public-private venture by the non-profit Birmingham Ecological Association, headed by [[Rust International]]'s [[Rodney Gilbert]] and developer [[Billy Eyster]]. Initially envisioned as a $35-50 million project for a "world class" zoo, the facility would replace the existing [[Birmingham Zoo|Jimmy Morgan Zoo]] at [[Lane Park]]. Zoo experts hailed the chosen site as an ideal setting.
The Ecoplex was proposed as a public-private venture by the non-profit Birmingham Ecological Association, headed by [[Rust International]]'s [[Rodney Gilbert]] and developer [[Billy Eyster]]. Initially envisioned as a $35-50 million project for a "world class" zoo, the facility would replace the existing [[Birmingham Zoo|Jimmy Morgan Zoo]] at [[Lane Park]]. Zoo experts hailed the chosen site as an ideal setting and the master plan, created by CLRR, Inc. of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was hailed as an example of a "4th generation" wildlife park, incorporating modern concepts for animal exhibits.


The process of forging cooperation among the scores of municipalities in the area was seen, early on, as the biggest challenge  to the project. [[Alabama Power]] CEO [[Elmer Harris]] challenged regional leaders to work toward the greater good for the region, but many suburban mayors complained that they had enough budgetary challenges already. Conflict between cities, such as Birmingham's lawsuit challenging the annexation of Liberty Park by [[Vestavia Hills]], also played a role in inhibiting cooperation. Private fund-raising was more successful, but perhaps divided as early commitments to what became the [[McWane Science Center]] were also being solicited.  
The process of forging cooperation among the scores of municipalities in the area was seen, early on, as the biggest challenge  to the project. [[Alabama Power]] CEO [[Elmer Harris]] challenged regional leaders to work toward the greater good for the region, but many suburban mayors complained that they had enough budgetary challenges already. Conflict between cities, such as Birmingham's lawsuit challenging the annexation of Liberty Park by [[Vestavia Hills]], also played a role in inhibiting cooperation. Private fund-raising was more successful, but perhaps divided as early commitments to what became the [[McWane Science Center]] were also being solicited.  
Line 10: Line 11:
Opponents included the [[Cahaba River Society]] and the local chapter of the [[Sierra Club]], who felt that the site, on the [[Cahaba River]] was too fragile to support such intensive development. Some residents of [[Redmont Park]] and [[Mountain Brook]] opposed the project out of fear of commercial redevelopment of the former zoo site. Those worried led the [[Birmingham City Council]] to formally dedicate scores of [[List of Birmingham parks|city parks]] that had never been officially dedicated. Others questioned the fact that the proposed park would actually exhibit fewer animals than the existing zoo.
Opponents included the [[Cahaba River Society]] and the local chapter of the [[Sierra Club]], who felt that the site, on the [[Cahaba River]] was too fragile to support such intensive development. Some residents of [[Redmont Park]] and [[Mountain Brook]] opposed the project out of fear of commercial redevelopment of the former zoo site. Those worried led the [[Birmingham City Council]] to formally dedicate scores of [[List of Birmingham parks|city parks]] that had never been officially dedicated. Others questioned the fact that the proposed park would actually exhibit fewer animals than the existing zoo.


Arrington later suggested building the ecoplex alongside the proposed [[Visionland]] amusement park in [[Bessemer]] or to a site alongside a proposed [[B.A.S.S.]] headquarters complex. Following the failure of the ecoplex project, efforts by the [[Friends of the Birmingham Zoo]] to upgrade and improve the existing zoo gained momentum.
Arrington later suggested building the ecoplex alongside the proposed [[Visionland]] amusement park in [[Bessemer]] or to a site alongside a proposed [[B.A.S.S.]] headquarters complex. Following the failure of the ecoplex project, efforts by the [[Friends of the Birmingham Zoo]] to upgrade and improve the existing zoo gained momentum. Some of the concepts for the ecoplex, such as an Alabama farm exhibit and open savannah space exhibiting several species in one area, found their way into redevelopment of the Lane Park zoo.


==References==
==References==
* "Group envisions "world-class" zoo. $35-50 million "ecoplex" sought near Liberty Park." (November 7, 1993) ''Birmingham News''
* "Group envisions "world-class" zoo. $35-50 million "ecoplex" sought near Liberty Park." (November 7, 1993) {{BN}}
* "Cooperation called big barrier to new zoo." (November 16, 1993) ''Birmingham News''
* "Cooperation called big barrier to new zoo." (November 16, 1993) {{BN}}
* "Zoo planner sees many advantages to ecoplex plan." (November 17, 1993) ''Birmingham News''
* "Zoo planner sees many advantages to ecoplex plan." (November 17, 1993) {{BN}}
* "Zoo plan worries Cahaba backers" (February 9, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "Zoo plan worries Cahaba backers" (February 9, 1994) {{BN}}
* "$750,000 raised to study plans for proposed new zoo off I-459" (February 15, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "$750,000 raised to study plans for proposed new zoo off I-459" (February 15, 1994) {{BN}}
* "Plans call for new zoo to be first of is kind in world." (March 15, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "Plans call for new zoo to be first of is kind in world." (March 15, 1994) {{BN}}
* "Three experts laud plans for new zoo." (April 26, 1994) ''Birmingham Zoo"
* "Three experts laud plans for new zoo." (April 26, 1994) {{BN}}
* "Ecoplex: The hows and whens: Proposed new zoo's price tag grows to $78 million." (May 18, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "Ecoplex: The hows and whens: Proposed new zoo's price tag grows to $78 million." (May 18, 1994) {{BN}}
* "Why a new zoo? Animals and visitors both would benefit, backers say." (May 19, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "Why a new zoo? Animals and visitors both would benefit, backers say." (May 19, 1994) {{BN}}
* "Eco-perplexity." (June 29, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "Eco-perplexity." (June 29, 1994) {{BN}}
* "County commission won't fund ecoplex." (July 7, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "County commission won't fund ecoplex." (July 7, 1994) {{BN}}
* "Cities wary about funding proposed zoo." (July 13, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "Cities wary about funding proposed zoo." (July 13, 1994) {{BN}}
* "Ecoplex wants to learn from San Diego arks. (August 3, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "Ecoplex wants to learn from San Diego arks. (August 3, 1994) {{BN}}
* "New zoo enthusiasts not fazed by lack of support." (September 21, 1994) "Birmingham News''
* "New zoo enthusiasts not fazed by lack of support." (September 21, 1994){{BN}}
* "Elephants will stay, polar bears may go." (October 12, 1994) ''Birmingham News''
* "Elephants will stay, polar bears may go." (October 12, 1994) {{BN}}
* "Mayor eyes park site for new zoo." (July 19, 1995) ''Birmingham News''
* "Mayor eyes park site for new zoo." (July 19, 1995) {{BN}}


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://www.ursainternational.org/BME.html Birmingham Ecoplex] master plan at Ursa International
* [http://www.ursainternational.org/our%20projects/Back%20in%20the%20Day/Birmingham%20Ecoplex/bme.html Birmingham Ecoplex] at Ursa International


[[Category:Unbuilt proposals]]
[[Category:Unbuilt proposals]]
[[Category:Birmingham Zoo]]
[[Category:Birmingham Zoo]]
[[Category:Liberty Park]]
[[Category:Liberty Park]]

Latest revision as of 19:03, 21 January 2016

Master plan for the Ecoplex

The Birmingham Ecoplex was a 300-acre "world class" zoological park proposed in the mid-1990s. The plans were developed by the Birmingham Ecological Association for a large tract of property owned by USX just southeast of Liberty Park near I-459. The $78.5 million project to replace the Birmingham Zoo never progressed beyond the master plan stage due to the inability of supporters to get funding commitments from Jefferson County and many of the region's separate municipalities.

Origins

The Ecoplex was proposed as a public-private venture by the non-profit Birmingham Ecological Association, headed by Rust International's Rodney Gilbert and developer Billy Eyster. Initially envisioned as a $35-50 million project for a "world class" zoo, the facility would replace the existing Jimmy Morgan Zoo at Lane Park. Zoo experts hailed the chosen site as an ideal setting and the master plan, created by CLRR, Inc. of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was hailed as an example of a "4th generation" wildlife park, incorporating modern concepts for animal exhibits.

The process of forging cooperation among the scores of municipalities in the area was seen, early on, as the biggest challenge to the project. Alabama Power CEO Elmer Harris challenged regional leaders to work toward the greater good for the region, but many suburban mayors complained that they had enough budgetary challenges already. Conflict between cities, such as Birmingham's lawsuit challenging the annexation of Liberty Park by Vestavia Hills, also played a role in inhibiting cooperation. Private fund-raising was more successful, but perhaps divided as early commitments to what became the McWane Science Center were also being solicited.

The project had the backing of then-Birmingham mayor Richard Arrington, who pledged $20 million from the City of Birmingham (funds made available by the sale of the Birmingham Industrial Water Board). Other public funding was to have come from a $1 per resident contribution from area municipalities over a 25-year period. Hoover mayor Frank Skinner budgeted $45,000 for his city's contribution in 1994. The plan was derailed, however, after the Jefferson County Commission decided not to participate.

Opponents included the Cahaba River Society and the local chapter of the Sierra Club, who felt that the site, on the Cahaba River was too fragile to support such intensive development. Some residents of Redmont Park and Mountain Brook opposed the project out of fear of commercial redevelopment of the former zoo site. Those worried led the Birmingham City Council to formally dedicate scores of city parks that had never been officially dedicated. Others questioned the fact that the proposed park would actually exhibit fewer animals than the existing zoo.

Arrington later suggested building the ecoplex alongside the proposed Visionland amusement park in Bessemer or to a site alongside a proposed B.A.S.S. headquarters complex. Following the failure of the ecoplex project, efforts by the Friends of the Birmingham Zoo to upgrade and improve the existing zoo gained momentum. Some of the concepts for the ecoplex, such as an Alabama farm exhibit and open savannah space exhibiting several species in one area, found their way into redevelopment of the Lane Park zoo.

References

External links

Retrieved from "http://bhamwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Ecoplex&oldid=123364"