Talk:Birmingham News building (1917): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Question about name) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Something occurred to me yesterday. Would the Wikipedia way to specify the two ''B'ham News'' buildings be to put the year in parentheses after the name (e.g. "Birmingham News building (1917)") rather than putting the year first? It's not a big deal, but it would allow the normal entry name to be used for category sort rather than having to enter a specific sort order for most categories. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 06:34, 15 September 2006 (PDT) | Something occurred to me yesterday. Would the Wikipedia way to specify the two ''B'ham News'' buildings be to put the year in parentheses after the name (e.g. "Birmingham News building (1917)") rather than putting the year first? It's not a big deal, but it would allow the normal entry name to be used for category sort rather than having to enter a specific sort order for most categories. --[[User:Lkseitz|Lkseitz]] 06:34, 15 September 2006 (PDT) | ||
* That seems like it's probably the right way to go. --[[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 08:08, 15 September 2006 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:08, 15 September 2006
Something occurred to me yesterday. Would the Wikipedia way to specify the two B'ham News buildings be to put the year in parentheses after the name (e.g. "Birmingham News building (1917)") rather than putting the year first? It's not a big deal, but it would allow the normal entry name to be used for category sort rather than having to enter a specific sort order for most categories. --Lkseitz 06:34, 15 September 2006 (PDT)
- That seems like it's probably the right way to go. --Dystopos 08:08, 15 September 2006 (PDT)